Leading cybersecurity solutions provider Check Point has firmly rejected claims of a significant data breach after a threat actor attempted to sell what they claimed was critical corporate information. The incident has sparked considerable attention in the cybersecurity community and highlights the importance of verified threat intelligence.
Analysis of the Alleged Data Breach
A threat actor operating under the alias “CoreInjection” posted an offer on BreachForums, attempting to sell purported Check Point confidential data for 5 Bitcoin (approximately $435,000). The alleged stolen data package supposedly contained internal network schemas, architectural diagrams, user credentials, and proprietary source code. However, subsequent investigation revealed significant discrepancies in these claims.
Technical Investigation and Scope Assessment
Check Point’s forensic analysis confirmed a limited security incident in December 2024, affecting only three organizations. The investigation revealed that the compromise occurred through a compromised account with restricted access permissions to the Check Point Infinity security management portal. The actual impact was substantially smaller than initially claimed, with no access to critical systems or production environments.
Security Architecture and Incident Response
The incident demonstrates the effectiveness of Check Point’s defense-in-depth approach to security. The company’s multi-layered security architecture successfully contained the breach, preventing lateral movement and limiting potential damage. This protective measure exemplifies the importance of implementing robust security controls and access management systems.
Independent Security Analysis
Hudson Rock’s Technical Director, Alon Gal, initially validated some evidence presented by the threat actor, including an administrative panel screenshot showing over 120,000 account records, with 18,824 belonging to active paid customers. However, following Check Point’s detailed disclosure, the initial assessment was revised, acknowledging that the breach’s scope was likely exaggerated.
This security incident serves as a crucial reminder of the importance of thorough incident verification and transparent communication in cybersecurity. Organizations should maintain robust security controls, implement least-privilege access principles, and regularly audit their security posture. The incident also demonstrates how threat actors often attempt to amplify the significance of security breaches for financial gain, underlining the necessity of careful validation of breach claims before drawing conclusions.
